JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 11, 2002

A- de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Transportes Monterrey Ltda

✓
Topic · hard data
Correccion Error Mecanografico Sentencia T-328/02
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

The case-law reporter has not yet indexed topics for this decision. The summary below describes what it is about.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó corregir el texto de la página uno de la Sentencia T-328/02, toda vez que existió un error de carácter mecanográfico en el cuerpo de la sentencia de la referencia que si bien no altera su fondo, si amerita su corrección para que pueda darse la ejecución de la misma.

El citado error consistió en la equivocada numeración de la sentencia en el encabezado de la misma, en efecto el número de sentencia correspondiente al expediente T-543477 es T-328/02 y no T-382/02 como quedó consagrado en el texto de la mencionada providencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. PRIMERO. CORREGIR el texto de la pagina uno de la Sentencia T-328/02, y en consecuencia, donde dice:
  2. "Sentencia: T-382/02"
  3. Cambiarse por:
  4. "Sentencia: T-328/02"
  5. SEGUNDO. COMUNIQUESE la mencionada correccion, a traves de Secretaria General, a la Relatoria de la Corte Constitucional, al Departamento de Sistemas de la Corte Constitucional y al Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Cundinamarca, Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela